Skip to main content

Fibrosis and cancer intersection

Introduction

Despite the decrease in cancer related deaths over the past 30 years, the incidence of six of the top ten cancers is increasing; breast, prostate, uterus, melanoma, pancreas, and colorectal cancer [1]. This alarming statistic raises the question of what has changed in recent years and supports the timeliness of this collection of articles that consider the role of fibrosis in cancer. If fibrosis is a precursor to cancer as has been suggested [2], is more fibrosis causing an increase in cancer now? Is it that fibrosis is associated with aging and the population is aging? Does the cancer in fibrosis act differently than cancer occurring in a non-fibrotic microenvironment? If we prevent fibrosis, will we prevent some cancers? The answers to these questions impact how we treat cancer and may provide the key for cancer prevention.

Background and significance

Fibrosis occurs in nearly every organ. Recurrent patterns emerge with persistent inflammation leading to scar formation as was clearly demonstrated during the COVID-19 pandemic [3]. Inflammation leading to fibrosis occurs in the lungs with acid reflux and environmental toxins causing irritation and ultimately scarring [4]. Acid reflux leads to esophageal inflammation and the scarring of Barrett’s esophagus [5]. Helicobacter pylori leads to inflammation of the gastric antrum and fibrosis with resultant B12 deficiency [6]. Ulcerative colitis leads to inflammation and results in scarring with the classic lead pipe deformity of the colon on barium exam [7]. Hepatitis can lead to liver cirrhosis [8], pancreatitis may lead to pancreatic fibrosis [9], chronic cystitis leads to a fibrotic bladder [10]. Renal inflammation leads to scaring [11]. Inflammation leading to fibrosis occurs in the eye, mouth, heart, and breast. Inflammation leading to fibrosis a recurrent theme throughout the body.

Is there more fibrosis now? What is the role of aging?

The number of patients with GERD continues to increase from nearly 450 million in 1990 to nearly 800 million in 2019 [12]. Helicobacter pylori currently effects 90% of population in developing countries with a significant annual recurrence rate [13]. Ulcerative colitis had an increasing prevalence of up to 5 million cases in 2023 [14]. Cirrhosis has increased by 13% since 2000 due to drug use, alcohol addiction, and metabolic syndrome [15]. Pancreatitis is increasing due to increasing obesity, diabetes, gallstones and advanced age [16]. UTIs are increasingly common affecting 12% of women and 3% men [17]. The incidence of Staphylococcus infection-associated glomerulonephritis (SAGN) cases increased due to drug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections [18]. Pulmonary fibrosis is increasing as our population ages [19].

Does the cancer in fibrosis act differently than cancer occurring in a non-fibrotic microenvironment?

We investigated lung cancer in a fibrotic and non-fibrotic background. Our results showed that squamous cell carcinoma was more frequently seen in the fibrotic lung and had shorter doubling times [20]. Nodules occurring in fibrosis were more likely to be lung cancer, challenging traditional screening algorithms [20]. If screening once a year for lung cancer in patients with emphysema decreases mortality, then we may need to screen more frequently for patients with lung fibrosis who are at increased risk of developing cancers with shorter doubling times. Cancer in a background of fibrosis is more likely to metastasize which may be in part due to fewer blood vessels and therefore the decreased ability of the body to keep the tumor from spreading [21].

If we prevent fibrosis, will we prevent some cancers?

In the lung, pirfenidone decreases collagen deposition in patients with pulmonary fibrosis. Miura showed reduced lung cancer in patients taking antifibrotic pirfenidone [22]. Ying reports decreased radiation induced lung fibrosis by inhibition of TGF-B1 [23]. Also, pirfenidone decreases exacerbations associated with surgery in patients with pulmonary fibrosis [24]. Breast density represents the extent of collagen in breast tissue. Göransson demonstrated how tamoxifen treatment reduced collagen organization and tissue stiffness in the normal breast [25]. Bäcklund reports the time to mammographic density decrease after Tamoxifen [26]. Kisseleva and Caligiuri describes liver fibrosis and its regression [27-28]. Mesenchymal stromal cells are a promising treatment for liver cirrhosis [29]. Decreasing fibrosis could prevent cancer occurrence.

Future directions

Early diagnosis of cancer could be improved with early diagnosis of fibrosis and radiology plays a central role with changes occurring before clinical symptoms. Each organ has a manifestation of fibrosis which typically involves organ shrinkage, duct dilatation and central arterial enlargement [30-32]. Advances in artificial intelligence may help with early fibrosis diagnosis and early cancer identification [33]. Zhang describes communication between cancer-associated fibroblasts and tumor microenvironment in breast cancer metastasis [34]. Collagen could be targeted to treat cancer [35]. Myofibroblast targeting could limit fibrosis as well as tumor progression [36]. Prostate cancer behavior can be manipulated by targeting stroma to overcome the limitations of current treatments [37]. Anti-TGF-B therapies in combination with traditional treatment may lead to improved outcomes [38].

Conclusions

We must move beyond early detection of cancer to cancer prevention. Chemoprevention may include strategies to slow down or reverse fibrosis as has been shown with antifibrotic treatments in the lung, liver and breast. The future success in the battle against cancer must include a combination approach of limiting inflammation, reversing scarring and detecting cancer at its earliest stage.

References

  1. Siegel RL, Kratzer TB, Giaquinto AN, Sung H, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2025. CA Cancer J Clin. 2025;75(1):10–45.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Hosseini M, Salvatore M. Is pulmonary fibrosis a precancerous disease? Eur J Radiol. 2023;160:110723.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tanni SE, Fabro AT, de Albuquerque A, Ferreira EVM, Verrastro CGY, Sawamura MVY, Ribeiro SM, Baldi BG. Pulmonary fibrosis secondary to COVID-19: a narrative review. Expert Rev Respir Med. 2021;15(6):791–803.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Newton CA, Noth I, Raghu G. Gastro-oesophageal reflux and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: sorting the chicken and the egg by genetic link. Eur Respir J. 2023;62(6):2301878.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Souza RF. The role of acid and bile reflux in oesophagitis and Barrett’s metaplasia. Biochem Soc Trans. 2010;38(2):348–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Waluga M, Kukla M, Żorniak M, Bacik A, Kotulski R. From the stomach to other organs: Helicobacter pylori and the liver. World J Hepatol. 2015;7(18):2136–46.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Roggeveen M, Tismenetsky M, Shapiro R. Best cases from the AFIP: ulcerative colitis. Radiographics. 2006;26(3):947–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Reynell C. Post-hepatitis cirrhosis. Lancet. 1954;267(6831):215–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Shimizu K. Mechanisms of pancreatic fibrosis and applications to the treatment of chronic pancreatitis. J Gastroenterol. 2008;43(11):823–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lai J, Liu X, Su H, Zhu Y, Xin K, Huang M, Luo S, Tang H. Emodin inhibits bladder inflammation and fibrosis in mice with interstitial cystitis by regulating JMJD3. Acta Cir Bras. 2023;38:e385123.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Tang PM, Nikolic-Paterson DJ, Lan HY. Macrophages: versatile players in renal inflammation and fibrosis. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2019;15(3):144–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang D, Liu S, Li Z, Wang R. Global, regional and National burden of gastroesophageal reflux disease, 1990–2019: update from the GBD 2019 study. Ann Med. 2022;54(1):1372–84.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Sun Y, Zhang J. Helicobacter pylori recrudescence and its influencing factors. J Cell Mol Med. 2019;23(12):7919–25.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Le Berre C, Honap S, Peyrin-Biroulet L. Ulcerative colitis. Lancet. 2023;402(10401):571–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Moon AM, Singal AG, Tapper EB. Contemporary epidemiology of chronic liver disease and cirrhosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;18(12):2650–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Iannuzzi JP, King JA, Leong JH, Quan J, Windsor JW, Tanyingoh D, Coward S, Forbes N, Heitman SJ, Shaheen AA, Swain M, Buie M, Underwood FE, Kaplan GG. Global incidence of acute pancreatitis is increasing over time: A systematic review and Meta-Analysis. Gastroenterology. 2022;162(1):122–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jones DE. Renal and urinary conditions: urinary tract infections. FP Essent. 2024;543:24–34.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Satoskar AA, Parikh SV, Nadasdy T. Epidemiology, pathogenesis, treatment and outcomes of infection-associated glomerulonephritis. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2020;16(1):32–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gulati S, Thannickal VJ. The aging lung and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Med Sci. 2019;357(5):384–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Salvatore MM, Liu Y, Peng B, Hsu HY, Saqi A, Tsai WY, Leu CS, Jambawalikar S. Comparison of lung cancer occurring in fibrotic versus non-fibrotic lung on chest CT. J Transl Med. 2024;22(1):67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Saqi A, Liu Y, Politis MG, Salvatore M, Jambawalikar S. Combined expert-in-the-loop-random forest multiclass segmentation U-net based artificial intelligence model: evaluation of non-small cell lung cancer in fibrotic and non-fibrotic microenvironments. J Transl Med. 2024;22(1):640.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Miura Y, Saito T, Tanaka T, Takoi H, Yatagai Y, Inomata M, Nei T, Saito Y, Gemma A, Azuma A. Reduced incidence of lung cancer in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis treated with Pirfenidone. Respir Investig. 2018;56(1):72–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ying H, Fang M, Hang QQ, Chen Y, Qian X, Chen M. Pirfenidone modulates macrophage polarization and ameliorates radiation-induced lung fibrosis by inhibiting the TGF-β1/Smad3 pathway. J Cell Mol Med. 2021;25(18):8662–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Iwata T, Yoshida S, Nagato K, Nakajima T, Suzuki H, Tagawa T, Mizobuchi T, Ota S, Nakatani Y, Yoshino I. Experience with perioperative Pirfenidone for lung cancer surgery in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Surg Today. 2015;45(10):1263–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Göransson S, Hernández-Varas P, Hammarström M, Hellgren R, Bäcklund M, Lång K, Rosendahl AH, Eriksson M, Borgquist S, Strömblad S, Czene K, Hall P, Gabrielson M. Low-dose Tamoxifen treatment reduces collagen organisation indicative of tissue stiffness in the normal breast: results from the KARISMA randomised controlled trial. Breast Cancer Res. 2024;26(1):163.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Bäcklund M, Eriksson M, Hammarström M, Thoren L, Bergqvist J, Margolin S, Hellgren R, Wengström Y, Gabrielson M, Czene K, Hall P. Time to mammographic density decrease after exposure to Tamoxifen. Oncologist. 2022;27(7):e601–3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Kisseleva T, Brenner D. Molecular and cellular mechanisms of liver fibrosis and its regression. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;18(3):151–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Caligiuri A, Gentilini A, Pastore M, Gitto S, Marra F. Cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying liver fibrosis regression. Cells. 2021;10(10):2759.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Yao L, Hu X, Dai K, Yuan M, Liu P, Zhang Q, Jiang Y. Mesenchymal stromal cells: promising treatment for liver cirrhosis. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2022;13(1):308.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Tarchi SM, Salvatore M, Lichtenstein P, et al. Radiology of fibrosis. Part I: thoracic organs. J Transl Med. 2024;22:609.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Tarchi SM, Salvatore M, Lichtenstein P, et al. Radiology of fibrosis part II: abdominal organs. J Transl Med. 2024;22:610.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Tarchi SM, Salvatore M, Lichtenstein P, et al. Radiology of fibrosis part III: genitourinary system. J Transl Med. 2024;22:616.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Liu Y, Hsu HY, Lin T, et al. Lung nodule malignancy classification with associated pulmonary fibrosis using 3D attention-gated convolutional network with CT scans. J Transl Med. 2024;22:51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhang W, Wang J, Liu C, et al. Crosstalk and plasticity driving between cancer-associated fibroblasts and tumor microenvironment: significance of breast cancer metastasis. J Transl Med. 2023;21:827.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Borst R, Meyaard L, Pascoal Ramos MI. Understanding the matrix: collagen modifications in tumors and their implications for immunotherapy. J Transl Med. 2024;22:382.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Yazdani S, Bansal R, Prakash J. Drug targeting to myofibroblasts: implications for fibrosis and cancer. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2017;121:101–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Di Carlo E, Sorrentino C. The multifaceted role of the stroma in the healthy prostate and prostate cancer. J Transl Med. 2024;22:825.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Peng D, Fu M, Wang M, et al. Targeting TGF-β signal transduction for fibrosis and cancer therapy. Mol Cancer. 2022;21:104.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mary Salvatore.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Salvatore, M., Marin, M.P. Fibrosis and cancer intersection. J Transl Med 23, 508 (2025). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12967-025-06520-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12967-025-06520-4